Leave a comment

Shunning someone


A public way of dealing with obnoxious people is to shun them. Turning one’s backs on aggressiveness. It is pointless to argue because it becomes a shouting match. It moves one from being a target  to being a response. This had been used in Mayor Ford’s current demise. He  ends up talking to himself.

 308 shunning-300x227

 

 

 

 

 

 

The principal is that the less the engagement the more possible that the outcome  will be less confrontational. Going  back to basics in anger  management the need is to protect and keep control. By responding aggressively to aggression only escalates the situation. It proves a point It makes you “right” but then so what?

In domestic fights so often mountain come out of molehills. When there is verbal abuse it is better to withdraw and protect oneself rater than argue. All arguing does is draw the other into having to be more right. Frequently it is better to show the other how ne feels than to say it. As any form of dialogue will be used against the protest. So why bother? The same applies in office blow ups when the object becomes to make the other person “wrong”

The passive way has had major successes, the biggest one being Gandhi’s passive resistance to British colonial rule. Of course there are situations where this is not possible. But how many fights could be tamed by not engaging the enemy? This implies a rational thought that any anger that is fear based requires thought on how to respond. It is about creating options rather than becoming  boxed in.

Source Toronto Star

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s